For regulated UAE organisations
Know how the work is done, and who sees what.
Prism interviews your people with consent, lets them review what is shared, and keeps every account with its evidence. Here is where the data goes and where our limits are, before you ask.
Where data lives and who sees what
- Consent first. A consent screen before the first question; we store when, and which wording.
- People review before sharing. Employees correct and withhold.
- Shared reports use pseudonyms, including in free text.
- Off-the-record remarks are rewritten and stored with no link to a person.
- Confidential mode (opt-in): administrators see group results only; groups under five are not shown; aliases are random. Exports are handled separately.
- Documents: keep, delete after N days (default 90), or process and discard.
- What is not finished: voice and AI processing are not confined to the UAE today. Provider regions, data terms, the DPA and the subprocessor list are being confirmed, and we will give them to you in writing.
What we hear from risk and transformation leaders (paraphrased)
- We have SOPs. Nobody follows them as written, and nobody can say where they differ.
- An automation list from two workshops will not survive a board.
- If staff are interviewed by an AI, where does it go, and who sees it?
- Security will ask where the data sits before they ask about the product.
How it works
- Scope one process and a pilot group. Start small, ideally on synthetic or low-risk material.
- Employees get a private link. Consent, then Sara, our AI interviewer (always disclosed), by voice or text, in their language.
- People review and withhold. Only then does the account count.
- You get the evidence. Accounts side by side, stated versus inferred, quotes attached, gaps flagged. SOPs read with cited steps and a Coverage view.
- Later, Verify. Owner-signed baseline, a four-week hold, and a result signed by the owner and Finance.
What is true today
- Every extracted SOP step cites its source; unread sections are flagged.
- Conflicting accounts are kept with who holds each.
- Only a result signed by the owner and Finance after a four-week hold is called verified.
- Worked example (findings only): about 70 invited, more than 90% completed.
- No verified result has been published yet, and we do not imply one.
Who sees what, in 30 seconds.
Questions, answered with the limit
Where does the data go?
Stated above. Data at rest is in Singapore today; voice and AI processing are not confined to the UAE, and we say so first.
Does this read as surveillance?
Consent, employee review, pseudonymised shared reports and Confidential mode. Confidential mode covers administrator screens; exports are separate, and customer names mentioned in interviews are not automatically filtered.
Is Verify a legal e-signature?
No. It records a named signer's decision in the app. Signers need a Prism account. It is not an audit opinion.
Is four weeks enough for seasonal processes?
It is the default hold. Talk to us about your case; we do not promise it is configurable.
You are a young vendor.
Yes. So start with one process and a small group, and judge on what you see.
Walk through one use case, from baseline to signed result.
On synthetic data, with your questions.